Sunday, March 3, 2013

Land-Living Animals Hurt by River Regulations


           Not only do invasive species reduce the biodiversity of the land, but human actions do as well.  A recent study done by Umea University in Sweden found that river regulation actually harms animals that live off the land.  It reduces the number of aquatic insects that fly onto the land and provide food for the land-living animals.  The population of flying insects is lower along regulated rivers, resulting in a decrease of spiders and insects.  Because birds, such as the Pied Flycatcher, rely on spiders and insects as a food course, they are negatively affected as well.  They lost more weight after their eggs hatched and fewer of their chicks survived.  Not only were just certain species affected, but whole bird communities as well.  The fact that these effects are still visible a half a century later clearly indicates that these changes are permanent. 

            In this study researchers concentrated on the effect biological insecticides had on the ecosystem.  These insecticides were used to regulate and reduce the number of mosquitoes among rivers in central Sweden, but are used all over the world as well.  The results of this study prove that river regulation has a negative effect on an ecosystem and results in poorer living conditions for a broad range of land-living animals. 

            The themes of nature of science this study has is collaborative, as many researchers helped contribute to the findings.  Also, it’s based on the evidence that there is less biodiversity of the land living animals and poorer conditions for them to live in.  The study is both credible and repeatable because there were three different studies conducted to support their results, all done by credible schools.  The motivation behind this was to explore the different effects that river regulation had on an ecosystem. 



Can Chlorine Make Your Hair Fall Out?

By Sarah Miner

No. That was conclusively proven after a study of 67 professional swimmers and 54 non-swimmers done in 2007. But even though swimming is good from a fitness standpoint, chlorine still has plenty of other less than desirable effects on hair. The study, which was published in Dermatology, found that 61 percent of the swimmers had hair discoloration, compared with none of the non-swimmers.

The scientists also found that cuticle damage often coincided with hair discoloration, and was apparently another effect of overexposure to chlorine. But although the swimmers' hair appeared coarse and damaged, there were no differences in the amount of hair loss in the two groups. You can prevent chlorine damage to hair, nails, and skin, by showering after practices and using chlorine specialized shampoos and conditioners.

Themes of Nature of Science
-- Science is based on evidence: There was substantial evidence to support the claims made in the study
-- Role of Motivation and Curiosity: I think that chlorine damage is something that a lot of people can relate to, and it's inspired lots of people to research it.
-- Importance of Repeatability: Since so many studies have been done on the topic, it's easier to get an idea of which data is accurate.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/health/09real.html?_r=0





Saturday, March 2, 2013

A Cure for HIV?

In the January issue of a genetics journal called Immunity, an article on a special protein was published. In this article, UCLA researchers described a protein that blocked out viruses.This protein was something called cholesterol-25-hydroxylase (CH25H), which is an enzyme that changes cholesterol into an oxysterol called 25-hydroxycholesterol (25HC). This oxysterol can enter a cell's membrane and keep viruses from getting in. The enzyme is only activated by interferon, which is a protein that sends cells antiviral signals. The human body happens to produce interferon. Unlike most other antiviral genes, 25HC is natural, soluble, and can be easily utilized.

Researchers at UCLA AIDS Institute were the ones who discovered that 25HC inhibits HIV in cells. They injected HIV-positive mice, that contained implanted human tissue, with 25HC. UCLA researchers realized that 25HC significantly reduced the amount of HIV each mouse had, in only seven days. The 25HC also reversed the T-cell depletion caused by HIV. Further testing showed that not only did 25HC destroy the HIV, but kept HIV from entering the cell. It was also found that 25HC inhibits the growth of other deadly viruses, such as Ebola, Nipah and the Rift Valley Fever virus.

Although it seems like there is finally magical cure, researchers aren't fully done yet. 25HC is hard to give in large doses, and its antiviral effect against Ebola, Nipah and other highly pathogenic viruses haven't yet been tested in a living being. Also, the researchers still need to test 25HC's effect against other HIV antivirals.

Link to article:
http://www.biologynews.net/archives/2013/02/11/newly_identified_natural_protein_blocks_hiv_other_deadly_viruses.html

NOS Themes:
  • Science is based on evidence: UCLA researchers did tests on mice and found that 25HC cured their HIV.
  • Importance of repeatability: The researchers were able to get the same effect from multiple mice they tested on.
  • Role of motivation and curiosity: If this "cure" works then many lives will be saved.
Related sites:
http://www.aidshealth.org/learn-about-it?gclid=CICo-sXK37UCFShgMgod0CwA7g
http://www.aidshealth.org/recently-diagnosed?gclid=CMO05t7K37UCFc5AMgod42YAbQ

Brains of Two Rats Linked by an Experiment



Can the brain be controlled from another body? neuroscientist Miguel Nicolelis thinks so. The doctor connected two rats' brains so that one was the encoder, the one who led the experiment and the other, the decoder, was the rat that repeated the steps the first rat did. To prevent lurking variables and bias, Dr. Nicolelis connected a rat in Natal, Brazil with a rat in North Carolina; the results were quite similar except for the difficulty that the message had to go through an internet connection. The experiment was done having the encoder rat press either a right or left lever with a signal of flashing light, the pattern was then sent to a computer which sent it to the decoder rat. The decoder rat was able to press the lever 7 out of 10 times. The doctor's experiment is the first of results that will prompt the advancement of a paralyzed person being able to do things using his/her brain and another person. That is to say that if a paralyzed person's brain is connected to another person who is not paralyzed, he/she can think of what they want to do and the message will be sent to the other person's brain through a computer.




Nature Of Science Themes
1. Science is collaborative-The scientists at Duke, Brazil, and in California worked together.
2. Science is based on evidence-To prove that the experiment worked, a test of operating a lever was administered to one rat and the other followed.

Article
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/science/new-research-suggests-two-rat-brains-can-be-linked.html?ref=science&_r=0

Color of Robins’ Eggs Determines Parental Care



“Color of Robins’ Eggs Determines Parental Care”


In the article “Color of Robins’ Eggs Determines Parental Care” by Queen's University biology professor Bob Montgomerie, he discusses his findings and the relationship on how a robin’s egg color could determine how much parental care it may receive. Professor Montgomerie has been learning about robins for twenty-five years and he was very captivated on how the bright blue color of robins’ eggs could make a difference in parenting. Dr. Montgomerie worked with student Philina English at the Queen’s University Biological Station and additional biological sites around Kingston, by substituting real eggs in robins’ nests with synthetic eggs with different shades of blue. Just before the real eggs were expected to hatch, the team of researchers replaced the artificial blue eggs with baby robins. Dr. Montgomerie clarifies, "We were testing the idea males can use egg color as a signal of the quality and health of their mate, and that healthy mates create better babies." His research paid attention to sexual selection and parental care in birds. As he came to discover, males whose nests contained the most vivid and bright blue eggs fed their newly-hatched babies twice as much. The blue color found in robin eggs is due to biliverdin, a pigment planted on the eggshell when the female robin lays the eggs. There is some evidence that has been created showing that higher biliverdin levels point toward healthier females and brighter blue eggs. Eggs that were laid by healthier females seemed to encourage males to take more initiative in feeding their young.


Natures of Science:
·         Science is Collaborative: Professor Bob Montgomerie worked alongside student Philina English at the Queen’s University Biological Station to discover the pigment in robins’ eggs that influences how much parental control will be provided for the young.
·         Science is based on Evidence: Scientist Montgomerie worked at the Queen’s University Biological Station and found hard evidence showing that when it seems that the eggs have a brighter shade of blue, than the male tends to pay more attention to the young.
·         Role of Motivation and Curiosity: Dr. Montgomerie had been studying Robins for twenty-five years and always had a particular curiosity and interest in the colors of the robin eggs.

Readers: Do you think the pigment biliverdin found in robins’ eggs affect how much the female mother wants to take care of the babies?

            I chose to read this article because I love bird watching and it sounded really fascinating! I have seen robins’ eggs before and I have always wondered if the change in the shade of blue of the egg makes a difference in the lifestyle of the robin. I really enjoyed reading this article because I learned a lot about robins and their eggs. I also loved reading about the pigment biliverdin because I had never heard of it and it is kind of crazy that it affects the parenthood of robins!


Friday, March 1, 2013

New Study Links BPA and Childhood Asthma


A study conducted by researchers at the Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health suggests a possible connection between BPA detected in urine samples of children and later problems with breathing. BPA stands for bisphenol A, and it is an industrial chemical that has been used to make certain plastics and resins since the 1960s. It can be found in everyday items such as water bottles, cups, toys, food cans, cash register receipts, and even some dental sealants.

The study consisted of a group of 568 mothers and their children having urine samples taken—the mothers during the third trimester of pregnancy and the children at different ages after they were born. The results showed that a child’s odds of having asthma were increased if BPA was detected in their urine samples at ages 3, 5, and 7. BPA detected in three year olds and seven year olds would also increase the probability of having later problems with wheezing.

Researchers still cannot explain how BPA increases the risk of the lung condition, since there is no current evidence indicating it alters the immune system in a way resembling asthma. We must keep in mind that there is plenty of asthma speculation around. Even just a few weeks ago, there was a study that suggested that the growing number of cesarean-section births may be partly to blame.


NOS Themes: science is based on evidence: urine tests were performed, giving conclusions from the evidence
                      role of skepticism: people can't automatically believe each new speculation for blaming asthma
                      science is subject to debate and tentative: once again, new evidence for links to diseases are not certain


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-study-links-bpa-and-childhood-asthma&page=2
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/bpa/AN01955
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/01/study-finds-link-between-bpa-and-asthma/?hpt=hp_bn13
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/ehs/news/2013/asthma-and-bpa

Birdbrain is an Insult? Think Again!

Summary:
           "Birdbrain" may not be much of an insult because humans and songbirds actually share the same genetic changes affecting the part of the brain that allows us to speak in languages and them to tweet songs.
           Birds are not born knowing the songs they will sing; they have to observe and imitate others to pick it up, just like humans. This shows that humans may be somewhat similar to birds. Neurologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center worked with his colleagues to research the topic to better understand it. The team analyzed tissue from three different humans, measuring the amount of particular molecules made by a gene to determine how active it is. They compared the results of the humans with brain tissue from birds that are capable of vocal imitation and singing like songbirds, hummingbirds and parrots, and as well as to birds that don’t like doves and quails. Jarvis and his colleagues found that the vocal-learning birds and humans share a same pattern of activity in about 40 genes in areas of the bird brain called Area X and the anterior striatum in human brains. They also found similar patterns of activity in a different region of about 40 genes involved in speech and song production.
           So the next time you get angry at someone and call them a "birdbrain," think again because it is not really an insult. It would rather be stating a fact for we humans are more similar to birds than we knew!

the amount of particular molecules made by a given gene to determine how active it is. They compared the results with brain tissue from bird species capable of vocal imitation and song learning — such as songbirds, hummingbirds and parrots — as well as birds that don’t, such as doves and quails. - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.DQbYWfTH.dpuf
the amount of particular molecules made by a given gene to determine how active it is. They compared the results with brain tissue from bird species capable of vocal imitation and song learning — such as songbirds, hummingbirds and parrots — as well as birds that don’t, such as doves and quails. - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.DQbYWfTH.dpuf
“Birdbrain” may not be much of an insult: Humans and songbirds share genetic changes affecting parts of the brain related to singing and speaking, new research shows. - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.DQbYWfTH.dpuf


NOS Themes:
  • Science is collaborative- Neurologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center worked with his colleagues to research the topic.
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
    Neurobiologist Erich Jarvis of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., and colleagues - See more at: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain#sthash.4imDszrv.dpuf
  • Science is based on evidence- The same results that bird tweets and the human language evolved from a genetic change in the same area of the brain was found as a trend from all the tests the team did.
  • Importance of repeatability- The team did tests on many different genes to see if birds share genetic changes like humans.

Article Link:
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/348340/description/Bird_human_tweets_come_from_similar_parts_of_the_brain

Related Links:
  • http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/8370/description/Birds_ancestors_had_small_genomes_too
  • http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/4073/description/City_Song_Birds_sing_higher_near_urban_traffic
  • http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/9277/description/Purring_birds_teach_their_chicks_to_beg
Created by Michelle Chang