Friday, May 31, 2013

Birds' Singing is an Audible Profile


     Researchers at Duke University found that a male bird's singing may show his strengths and weaknesses to potential mates. For a long time it was believed that the more songs a bird knew, the smarter it was. This experiment found that while birds with large singing repertoires excel in some areas of cognitive function, their singing ability also leaves them with deficiency in other areas. This is because while the bird is developing resources may either mostly go to the HVC, the song controlling area of the bird's brain, or the hippocampus, the part of the brain that controls spatial learning. This is important because birdsong is a good way of studying speech development.

NOS Themes:
  • Science is collaborative
  • Science is based on evidence
  • Role of chance
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130521194141.htm

Benefits of Learning Biology

Conducting an experiment involving 1,516 students at Kansas State University, researchers found that students who did well in biology were able to perform exceptionally well in rigorous genetics course. This was expected, but what researchers found was that even after several years, students didn't forget what they had learned in biology and were able to apply it to a hard genetics course after several years.
NOS:
Science is based on evidence
Importance of Repetability
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130531132737.htm

Mountain Populations Offer Clues to Human Evolution

In recent studies, scientists have been researching the differences of human evolution up in mountainous regions. This, according to professor of human genetics Anna di Rienzo, is a whole different case of natural selection. These observations can supposedly be important towards the field of evolutionary biology by examining the different DNAs of people living in the mountains. 

As people transition to higher elevations, there starts to become a problem with getting enough oxygen. However, the human body does its part to attempt to adjust. According to this article, some produce higher levels of hemoglobin, which allows for greater circulation of oxygen. However, because higher levels lead to blood clot, studies have shown that living in the mountains are a lot easier for those whose ancestors have been occupying those regions for generations. 

 Studies on people of Tibet by Dr. Nielsen have shown that these adaptations in DNA have found that the gene EPAS1 was the main factor in adapting to different altitudes. However, studies in Nigeria by two other teams examined the genes of Ethiopians also living in high altitudes, and found no EPAS1 present. Instead, the gene BHLHE41 was prominenti n their DNA. It was concluded that both genes allow for humans to better cope with varying levels of altitudes. However, more work will have to be done to figure out the differences of the workings of those two genes.

 NOS Themes:


 Science is collaborative; multiple teams of scientists worked in attempt to figure out the adaptations in people's DNA


 Science is subject to debate and tentative; the two teams of scientists had conflicted findings with two different genes. It is subject to debate as to what each one will exactly do. 


Role of motivation and curiosity; scientists were interested and curious as to how different humans around the world adapt to different levels of altitude. 


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/30/science/mountain-populations-offer-clues-to-human-evolution.html?_r=0&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1370061677-WTpjaVCLsC1k9U3ayloPHA


Adrianna Tan Hour 3

Apes Get Emotional Over Games of Chance

          
              Researchers say that, like humans, chimpanzees and bonobos throw angry tantrums and pout whenever a risk-taking strategy doesn't go their way. It is known that emotions play a critical role to humans in making complex decisions, but researchers wanted to know if the processes are shared with other animals when making decisions.The experiment started with the apes having to make a choice on whether they wanted to obtain a large reward or take a chance to get a high-quality treat. If they take the chance for the high-quality treat, they risk receiving a non-preferred food item if their gamble does not go how they want it to. When making these decisions, chimpanzees were more patient and likely to take risks than bonobos. Anger, pouting, scratching, and tantrums were all responses when their choice showed the less preferred outcome. A few of the responses that were displayed were species-specific but others were unique differences to the animal. Overall, the researchers stated that the apes did show emotional responses to decision making.
Themes of Nature of Science:
Science is based on evidence: The researchers had to perform the tests to get their evidence that apes did show the emotional responses.
Role of motivation and curiosity: If someone wasn't curious about the apes, we would never know that they had emotional responses to decision making.
Importance of repeatability: The tests about the apes were probably done many times to make sure that that their responses were not a one-time thing.
Link to article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130529190933.htm

Rats Eyes Move in Opposite Directions?

http://www.biologynews.net/archives/2013/05/28/rats_have_a_double_view_of_the_world.html



Scientists have recently discovered that Rats move their eyes in opposite direction when running around. Using small high-speed cameras, they have discovered the motions of the rat's eyes. Their eyes allow them to be constantly surveying the area above them, watching for predators. This observation also shows that rats do not fuse the visual information into one image, like humans. Scientists hypothesize that this vision drastically helps them survive against birds and other predators.

NOS Themes
Role of motivation and curiosity
Science is based on evidence

Robo Bee

ROBO BEE
This Robotic Bee Just Took Flight, to Pollinate Crops and (Maybe) Spy on You
Lukas Wood
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=this-robotic-bee-just-took-flight-t-2013-05

 After 12 years of work, researchers at the Harvard School
 of Engineering and Applied Sciences have succeeded in creating a fly-like robot. It is about the size of a quarter and weighs 80 milligrams. its wings are designed just like an insects.  At the moment there isnt a small enough battery to support the robobee for more than 20 seconds. One of the first goals for the robobee was to be able to take of the responsibility of the dwindling population of honey bees in pollinating crops and flowers. another thought is that they could be used for spying.

Themes.
Science is collaborative.
Role of motivation and curiosity.

New Method Discovered for Identifying Salmonella

An image of salmonella,
courtesy of the Wikimedia Foundation.

                Recently, a new method of salmonella identification has been discovered which will reduce the process’s length by more than half. The standard practice, gel electrophoresis, takes several days. The new technique devised by researchers at Penn state will reduce the time to just one. This method focuses on just two genes and two other small areas of the genome, which allow for accuracy similar to that of standard electrophoresis. Considering that salmonella outbreaks need to be traced to their source as fast as possible, this breakthrough is potentially revolutionary, in terms of finding salmonella outbreaks. While salmonella only seems to kill a few hundred people a year at most, this is only because we’ve become very adept at finding and squashing the bad strains. As we become even more effective, it will only become easier to destroy them. It’s not the most extreme discovery, but it’s still a worthwhile one.

NOS Themes: 
3.) The researchers only decided that the method worked after testing it in a blind study. It will very likely have to be tested much more thoroughly before being adopted by any other institutions.
4.) This method was devised in Penn State, a relatively well-known college, by an associate professor. While this doesn't bar the individual from needing to have their work reviewed, this person is probably not making things up, as he's managed to hold his position at the university for quite awhile.

Omega-3 Fatty Acids May Help Heal a Broken Heart

 Omega-3 Fatty Acids May Help Heal a Broken Heart

This article is about new research that shows that omega-3 fatty acids may help reduce inflammation caused by heart surgery, helping the heart heal more fully and faster. The new information could help doctors treat heart disease and could be used to alter the patients diet by increasing the amount of omega-3's eaten. The research was done at  the Heart and Vascular Center at the University of California, in San Francisco, CA. Researchers tested the effect of a fatty-acid compound on cultured cells from bypass patients, and found that those with the fatty acid were much less inflamed. These results are especially promising because omega-3 supplements are already readily available in the form of fish oil.

NOS Themes:
Science is collaborative
Science is based on evidence
Role of motivation and curiosity

Article found here

Sea Urchins Destroy

Article:
  • http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110114164516.htm
Similar Link:
  • http://www.reef2reef.com/forums/reef-aquarium-discussion/53447-sea-urchins-destroy-reef-building-algae-overfished-sites-kenyas-coast.html
  • lib.bioinfo.pl/news/similar/492104




An  study of Kenya's coral reefs by the University of California at Santa Cruz found that overfished reef systems have more sea urchins. Sea urchins eat coral algae that build tropical a reef. The scientist found that reefs with large numbers of sea urchins reduced the coralline algae. This species of algae allow for reef growth. The researchers found that sea urchins were the dominant grazer in the fished reefs, where the predators of sea urchins were fairly absent. These under-appreciated coralline algae are known to bind and stabilize reef skeletons and sand as well as grow small corals by providing a place for their larvae to settle. The study shows the cascading effects of predator loss on a reef.
Overall, reefs with more sea urchins grew significantly slower than ones with more complete fish communities.

NOS ThemesScience is collaborative
Science is based on evidence
Role of motivation and curiosity

Sweet Confusion

High-fructose corn syrup was created when scientists experimented with the molecular structure of cornstarch. Their goal was to transform glucose into fructose. Even though their discovery was in 1957, it was widely overlooked until skyrocketing sugar prices in the 1980's pushed corporations to look for a less expensive alternative. High-fructose corn syrup became a leading ingredient in many foods ranging  from baked goods to ketchup. This didn't stir the public who, until a game-changing study was published in 2004, simply wanted their food to be sweet and cheap. However that study done by the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition linked the sweetener to obesity, high blood pressure, and metabolic disorders. But why does high-fructose corn syrup cause so many health problems? When eaten in normal amounts, fructose is turned into energy by your body. But when consumed excessively, the problems start. If the liver absorbs too much fructose, the excess energy is stored as fat, which can cause enough health problems on its own. Too much fructose can also cause insulin resistance which leads to diabetes. Basically, the main problem with high fructose corn syrup is that it is very concentrated fructose. However it is important to keep in mind that this can happen for any type of sugar. As Miriam Vos, a pediatric liver specialist asks, “If you replaced all of the high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar, would we be better off? No. We would be exactly in the same place.”

NOS themes:
Science is subject to change, these studies are not final and could be disproved with more research.
Science is collaborative, many researchers worked together to come to these conclusions. 
Article link: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/350460/description/Sweet_Confusion

Bees in the Bird Nest


A new study done by the Laboratory of Behavioral Ecology and Evolution at Seoul National University in South Korea has found that a bee’s buzz could be one factor that helps them invade and steal bird nests. Their buzz had been used previously as a warning to their predators against hunting them, as their sting could be potentially harmful. In this study, however, Piotr Jablonski and his team found that not only does the sound of this buzz warn the birds not to attack the bees; it also prompts them to leave their nests.

First, they wanted to see if the bees would try to take over the bird nests, so they created multiple nest boxes that were soon inhabited by birds. When they checked the boxes, they found that up to twenty-one percent of the boxes had been taken over by bees, while the boxes without bird nests had been left untouched. They then decided to test the effect the bee’s buzz on incubating birds. To do this, they placed a speaker under the layers of moss inside the nest box and played the sound of the buzz. They then waited for the birds to arrive, and observed their reaction with a small camera inside the box. They found that the sound of the bumblebee buzz made them nervous, and they often abandoned the nest. To provide a control, they played songs of common birds, which left them with far less stress.

They concluded “that a warning signal, known to help deter predatory attacks on a potentially harmful prey, may also help the prey to win ecological competition with its predators."

NOS Themes

·         Science is collaborative

·         Science is based on evidence

·         Role of motivation and curiosity

Elevated Carbon Dioxide Making Arid Regions Greener

In a recent study, researchers have found that elevated carbon dioxide levels are making arid regions greener. They focusing on the southwestern corner of North America, Australia's outback, the Middle East, and some parts of Africa. During the time-span of the study carbon dioxide levels have increased by fourteen percent. In the researched areas vegetation grew by eleven percent in the same time-span. When there is more carbon dioxide in the air, trees take in more carbon dioxide. By doing this, they effectively reduce the amount of water that is released. This process results in the change of leaf color of  the trees. This can be viewed by satellites. Now trees are growing in grasslands where trees have never grown. This shows there are many adverse effects of global warming.


NOS themes:

Science is collaborative- A group of researchers worked to find the results.
Science is based on evidence- There is satellite evidence of the changes in vegitation.


Link: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130531105415.htm 

Flexible Feet

Our feet haven't forgotten <i>(Image: Plainpicture/Johner)</i>

A new study has found that not all feet are the rigid design that makes it better suited for walking.  Previously it was thought that humans have rigid feet and apes have more flexible feet that are better at grasping trees.  A flexible foot bends at the ball of the foot and halfway between the ball and the heel. Humans have a joint there but usually ligaments cross the joint and keep it stiff.  However, some of us have softer ligaments that allow the mid foot to bend.  

This was discovered when Jeremy DeSilva and Simone Gill from Boston University videotaped 400 people  walking around barefoot at the Boston University of Science.  They found that about 8 percent of people have some midfoot flexiblity.  An interesting part of this is that the people who had these feet were not aware of the flexibility and their gait was the same, but when a close up camera was used it was obvious that they had the flexibility.

NOS Themes:  
Role of motivation and curiosity: This is an interesting study that many people wouldn't have thought to look for.
Science is tentative: It is not yet known whether flexible feet have always been something humans have had , and if it makes walking more efficient.




Why Early Human Ancestors Took to Two Feet

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130524104041.htm



A recent study suggests that human ancestors may have first began walking on two feet when they found a home in rockier terrain.  The study, done by archaeologists at the University of York, challenges an earlier theory that states that hominins were forced to become bipedal when climate change reduced tree cover.  Instead, the archaeologists believe that hominins were attracted to the shelter offered by rocky outcrops and rugged terrain in East and South Africa, and that their new habitat resulted in the development of bipedalism.  This would also have left hands and arms free to develop greater dexterity.  The ability to run could have developed as hominins ventured onto surrounding plains, and greater cognitive abilities could have developed as the varied terrain called for better communication and navigation.

NOS Themes:
  • Scientific ideas are subject to change.  The old theory about how upright walking developed may be rejected as a result of this new research.
  • Science explains and predicts.  This study may explain several aspects of human evolution.
  • Science demands evidence.  There is less evidence for the idea that climate change caused humans to walk on two feet.

Researchers Coax Clays to Make Human Bone

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130530152858.htm

In this article scientists find a new way to coax clay into forming human bone.  Normally, adults cannot make new bone, but this new finding may allow scientists to create new bone for people who suffer from weak, broken, or damaged bones that will not regenerate.  The nanosized clay mesh scaffold used to produce the bone is degradable and compatible with human cells, and eventually cells degrade the material and are able to produce bone.  The new technology could also lead to other tissue regeneration techniques, such as for organs and other tissues.
NOS themes:
Science is collaborative - the scientists in this article published numerous articles and journals about the technology they developed that will lead to further research in this area.  They based their research on studies done since 2008.
Importance of repeat-ability - The studies conducted since 2008 were all closely related to each other, and all have produced consistent results (and thus the scientists are confident in their results)

The BBC Stress Test's Results

Stress is something everyone can relate to at some point in their life. An experiment, with a sample size of over thirty thousand people, was conducted by All in the Mind and BBC Lab UK. There are many factors that contribute to a person's stress level, such as biological factors, social factors, traumatic events, and psychological factors. The main objective of the study was to see how important these factors are in a person's stress level and there severity. They also wanted to see how they interact with each other in contributing to stress levels.  For this experiment, the researchers measured depression and anxiety as they are two extreme mental health issues.


The results obtained from the data gathered from the sample suggested that mental health is depended on events that we partake in and how we deal with them. Negativity leads to immensely bad mental health. 


Nature of Science Themes
1. Science is collaborative
2. Science is tentative
3. Science is testable

Article
http://www.bbc.co.uk/labuk/results/stress/index.html

Do Seasons Affect Babies?



A seven yearlong study conducted on 21,000 babies worldwide says seasons do affect the babies significantly.  The study, led by scientists at Harvard, shows that babies born in winter and spring are taller, weigh more, and are more intelligent.  The study also shows that babies born in the fall are more likely to live longer and are less prone to illness at older ages.  The season of birth can also influence whether a person is an optimist or pessimist.  Summer's babies that have a brighter outlook than winter-born grumblers.  Scientists don’t know exactly why these differences occur, but they believe it may be due to exposure to changing seasonal factors such as temperature, rainfall and ultraviolet radiation may be responsible.  I don’t believe that seasons are the only thing that affects the baby’s characteristics; genes must take an important role in determining its characteristics.  What do you think affects a baby’s characteristics?
NOS Theme(s):
1.      Science is subject to debate and tentative
2.      Importance of repeatability
3.      Science is collaborative